Wir wollen nicht zweideutig sein
Wir in OII wünschen nicht, in eine Debatte über die Terminologie (DSD) mit Alice Dreger verwickelt zu werden und hoffen, dass wir darüber nicht zweideutig sind.
It is true that with the new terminology (DSD) do not agree.
It is important to understand that our objections are based on changes in the field of intersexuality not just terminology. This would trivialize the discussion.
In the following, we would state clearly why we are in fundamental contradiction with Alice Dreger and why we disapprove of what they done to the intersex community added.
following concern to us and has nothing to do with terminology.
has done what Alice Dreger?
1) DSD is defined as a genetic defect, as opposed to intersexuality, which was not previously considered genetic defect. Dreger has recommended doctors intersexuality replaced by DSD, as that term is accurate. Yes, DSD is more accurate and we are the objectives of that precision.
2) Current research is trying to locate other intersex conditions genetically, more and more American Idol be detected in utero by genetic terms and definitions.
3) For three years she defends a proponent of eugenics (J. Michael Bailey, a man who has a lot to do with intersexuality) Here you can find his article about homosexuals eugenics read
4) DSD allows legally and ethically, standardization and normalization procedures an Kindern vorzunehmen, da eine STÖRUNG gesetzlich ohne Zustimmung des Kindes behandelt werden kann - es ist jetzt eine genetische Störung, dank Alice Dreger.
Würde Dreger den Begriff "Intersexualität" wie im oben genannten Fall benutzten, dann würden wir ihn genau entgegengesetzt verwenden.
0 comments:
Post a Comment