Friday, February 8, 2008

Seaworld Leather Bracelet With Name Engraved

The McDonaldization of Intersexaktivismus

a binarism please, super large
The McDonaldization of Intersexaktivismus
By Curtis E. Hinkle


When I read the following article: http://www.isna.org/faq/ not_eradicating_gender I started about consider how many of us marginalized in the intersex community feel ridiculed and excluded groups that speak for us.

Just imagine a world in which the main distribution of individuals would be the size. This would be the first thing would be determined at birth and should appear on the birth certificate.

Just imagine a world where the big men dominated small and it would make a small person very hard to be a large and vice versa. Imagine a world in which medium-sized people could not legally exist without being labeled as a big or small person. Here are the possible solutions in order to grant medium-sized people a civil status in this world: forced starvation or forced feeding, not to have this dreaded ambiguity, as we all know that everyone is indeed a big or small person.

One could perhaps only be a great person was born with a defect, which can look a little like a person, or vice versa.

So people can get their big power status, it must schedule all the members legally and socially imposed, so that we all know our place - as small or large person. Here are some consequences of the legally imposed standard:

- Great people can marry only small people, and vice versa.
- Great people claim to have more money, power and prestige.
- Little people have to deal with the everyday needs of large people.
- One can only be a little big for one person, after being diagnosed as mentally disturbed and was force-fed then agreed to be under medical supervision.
- No one can ever be an average sized person. This is illegal. marginalized

A group of people who are middle-sized (group A), feels and decides to fight against the oppression of the two-sizes-system because they see it as oppressive feel and imposed upon them unnatural treatments so they fit.

They also feel that their natural size is not recognized and their identities are erased in such a system. They feel that no classifications based on the size of people are needed and only adds to oppression, not only their own but also those of others. You should just be allowed to person and are legally guaranteed rights that everyone else has.

Another group of medium-sized individuals (group B) finds the size based on binary classification to be accurate, because they know that they actually are a large or small person and feel comfortable with this dichotomy well. My question is: Which group of medium sized Excludes people and marginalized the other group?

Next Question: Group B claims that A is a group size society without fighting. Is this really true? No. A group fighting to have any size to have the same rights as everyone, regardless of size for the right of the people. You do not feel that size is something that will just disappear. They feel that it is not something that people against their will should be imposed and with only two choices - large or small. To end the "Grössismus. An argument that is often used to marginalize in binary intersex to International Gender and transgender our community is this: "Many people who are not intersex, identify themselves as Inter Gender. . Many people who are not intersex identify themselves as transgender "

We want to determine the obvious: Many people who are not intersex identify within the binary - this is not something specific to intersex people and makes Binaristen no generally valid Group within the intersex community.

0 comments:

Post a Comment